My Take: The Hobbit (2012)

I do believe the worst is behind us. - Bilbo Baggins

Early on in The Fellowship of the Ring, Bilbo Baggins laments his unnaturally long life, which has been artificially bestowed upon him by The One Ring. Understanding that he's overstayed his welcome in the Shire, he gloomily reflects, “I feel thin, sort of stretched, like butter scraped over too much bread.”

If only Peter Jackson was offered the same insight.

I would laugh at how apt this metaphor plays for the very existence of this film if it weren't so exceedingly sad. Indeed, Jackson dares to take a 300 page book - and a children's book at that! - and spread its meager storytelling potential over not one film, not two, but three films. He has the audacity to take a story that really holds no more than one thematic thread - Bilbo goes to The Lonely Mountain with the Dwarves - and extend it over what surely will become 10 hours of film! I wonder how Tolkien would feel about Jackson - the same man who so vividly brought his own Lord of the Rings saga to life a decade ago - and his treatment of his beloved property now?

It's clear that Jackson was less interested in creating The Hobbit than in celebrating his own massively successful Lord of the Rings saga. For a film titled The Hobbit, I find it ironic that Bilbo is essentially absent for half the film. And even when he's present, he's excruciatingly passive, too often relegated to look scared! Look worried! Look confused!  In fact, the film would surely be better titled had it been called, Peter Jackson's Middle Earth Masturbatory Extravaganza: Everything Tolkien Ever Wrote That Was Absent From Lord of the Rings Squeezed into One Film.

Sadly, I can't help but see this film as nothing more than the greatest manifestation of Peter Jackson's hubris. Jackson is a supremely talented filmmaker - there's no other man I could think of who would've dared make three epic films simultaneously. But much like Christopher Nolan, Jackson is also far from artistic; he's a perfectly functional director. Where subtlety is appreciated, he slams it home with a lumbering thud. Where wit and elegance is key, he chooses to drive it into the audience with monotonous dialogue.

Given what must have been an infinite budget, rights to the best film-making technology, and access to the world's best actors, Jackson doesn't leverage his assets to create something potent and memorable; instead, he overindulges in his greatest proclivities for excesses (this is after all, the same director who made King Kong battle not one, not two, but three T-Rexes in his remake of King Kong). This entire film is unnecessarily talky, spewing expository dialogue and pointless backstory as if he - Jackson did also write the screenplay after all - were paid by the word. Each action sequence is drawn out to the point of boredom, at best, and severe annoyance, at worst. Consequently, this balloons the film's running time to an inexcusable 160 minutes, which is at least 40 minutes too long and far too cumbersome.

In spite of all its immaculate CGI - and for the sake of giving credit where credit's due, Gollum's performance here is top notch, arguably the film's saving grace - The Hobbit is just plain boring. It has lost all the joy that was once so vibrant in The Lord of the Rings, lost its sense of adventure and wonderment. Like a jaded rehash - which, let's be honest, this is a prequel - The Hobbit can't help but hit each cliched story point like clockwork. Here's the Shire. Here's Bilbo. Here's Bilbo leaving the Shire. He gets into trouble. He escapes unscathed. Rinse and repeat for the next two hours.

This is no longer a film about a reluctant hero finding courage to explore the world. It's devolved into a gnarled pit of visual effects and gross overindulgence in unnecessary technology. It's all about self-aggrandizement. It's all about greed. It's all about the fucking money. It's all flash but no substance. It scampers and runs and hurries but never thrills. It emotes and pretends and yearns but never touches.

When the dust settles, I fear we will no longer look back on Jackson's legacy as a brilliant and visionary filmmaker. For all the fleeting grace and gossamer fancy that Lord of the Rings offered, I believe Jackson will forever be associated to and remembered for this heavy, hairy-footed thud.