MY TAKE: The Ides of March (2011)

Cut to the chase: Dramatically gripping and politically unnerving, The Ides of March dares to shed light on the dark underbelly of the current American political landscape. Sure, its ideas and presentation might be a bit deceiving and exaggerated; but damn it all, isn’t that the definition of politics?


I couldn’t watch this movie without drawing parallels between Governor Mike Morris (Clooney) and President Barack Obama, between the inevitable clash of political ambitions and moral abilities. I couldn’t help but wonder what burden success bears on one man’s integrity. And more than that, what a truly idealistic, shallow and ultimately disappointing political process we live in today.

Governor Morris, with the help of his campaign director Paul Zara (Hoffman) and hotshot senior staffer Stephen Meyers (Gosling), is in the midst of battling for the Ohio Democratic primary, a fulcrum that will essentially decide the Presidential election. Morris promises no more combustion engine cars by the turn of the next decade. He pleads for peace in the Middle East by severing our dependence on oil. He promotes religious freedom and an end to minority persecution. He pushes for an all around green environment and reinvigoration of the American spirit. Hell, even Morris’ “Believe” campaign posters are a blatant echo of Obama’s “Change” campaign. Essentially, Morris is as close to Obama 2.0 as we’ll get without explicitly dropping Obama’s name.

This is all good and dandy; Morris is shown briefly but to potently rousing effect in the first half of the film. This backseat approach allows for the real mastermind behind the campaign, Meyers (Gosling), to take center stage. But after an ill-advised strategic move pushes Meyers into the darkest corners of the campaign machinations, the shine of the entire political landscape which he’s so steadfastly supported fades to nothing more than a façade of lies and deceit.

Ultimately, I think what got under my skin the most about this film wasn’t actually the film itself. Sure, the performances were solid across the board. Clooney (here playing writer, producer, actor, and director) has mastered the seething anger-scowl as well as Gosling has mastered the contemplative distant-stare. And much like the master-apprentice relationship their two characters share in the film, Clooney and Gosling appear to be winking at the proverbial passing of the torch from established star to hottest up-and-comer in Hollywood. On top of that, the script itself is nothing short of pure drama and deceptive power plays, politically charged and emotionally conflicting.

But really, the best part of this film, as it should be with any great work of art, is the relevance and poignancy of its ideas. From the opening scene, we are introduced to the exacting preparation of Morris’ upcoming debate – a process as premeditated as it is artificial. From then, we are given repeated glimpses into the dirty workings of the political machine, into the real incentives behind each character’s journey and the costs of success. So in a time when moral character seems to directly conflict with political will, The Ides of March comes along and paints a portrait of not one, not two, but arguably an entire nation of people who will stop at nothing to gain power. Backs are stabbed as easily as souls are sold. Personal gains are weighed swiftly and effortlessly against the greater good – and the results are not always what you might expect.

At one point in the film, Meyers describes why he works for Morris. It comes down to a simple yet achingly naïve sentiment: he believes in what Morris stands for. Yet as the screws turned tighter and tighter, at first crippling Meyers’ professional goals then threatening his personal life, I began to wonder not if Meyers truly believed in Morris’ political agenda, but if he believed in anything at all. It was obvious to me that Meyers – or arguably any character in this film for that matter – was not meant to be painted as the villain. Indeed, he was meant to be a real human being – the perfect example of a double-edged sword – a man whose own convictions had inarguably gotten him to where he was but whose future now hung in the shadow of his own hubris. It’s all a sticky and jumbled mess I know. And I’m veering head-first into deeply cynical territory. But for as dramatic and (semi-)fictional this all seems, The Ides of March really just goes to show how truly fucked up our current political landscape really is. That’s what I believe.